This is openvpn on pfSense server to Fedora 25 client ovpn 2.3.14 My question is, what does this mean: "TLS Error: Unroutable control packet received" Is it a network problem or is this something to do with security ?
TLS payload ciphertext (n bytes) (only for P_CONTROL_V1). Note that when –tls-auth is used, all message types are protected with an HMAC signature, even the initial packets of the TLS handshake. This makes it easy for OpenVPN to throw away bogus packets quickly, without wasting resources on attempting a TLS handshake which will ultimately fail. I can't make an OpenVPN server work with the new easy-rsa 3.0 setup. Worked flawlessly in the past with the bundled 2.0-branch. Tried it on two separate host providers (one with a working legacy config). # uname -a Linux server-asia 3.13 CVE-2017-7478: Proof of Concept Code for the OpenVPN Pre-Authentication DoS Vulnerability - dos_server.py Oct 14 16:33:51 openvpn 98052 UDPv4 READ [117] from [AF_INET]23.236.224.213:4443: P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 sid=dcfec650 503a08a2 tls_hmac=5ddfe7e1 f063d62a eabfff86 533524bc dc63fcdd 5f665903 6c76af3d f671a535 pid=[ #6 / time = (1571085231) Mon Oct 14 16:33:51 2019 ] [ 2 sid=25d2887f 1a4b6725 ] pid=5 DATA 14030300 01011603 0300288c 7c90fd1d root @ /etc/openvpn # openvpn --config vpn0.conf Mon Nov 30 07:37:59 2009 OpenVPN 2.1_rc20 i686-pc-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO2] [EPOLL] built on Oct 18 2009 Mon Nov 30 07:37:59 2009 IMPORTANT: OpenVPN's default port number is now 1194, based on an official port number assignment by IANA. OpenVPN 2.0-beta16 and earlier used 5000 as the default port. Feb 9 22:51:43 openvpn[43025]: 178.190.212.71:39903 UDPv4 WRITE [166] to [AF_INET]178.190.212.71:39903: P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 pid=[ #45 ] [ 5 ] pid=42 DATA len=100 Feb 9 22:51:43 openvpn[43025]: 178.190.212.71:39903 TLS Auth Error: Auth Username/Password verification failed for peer Feb 9 22:51:43 openvpn[43025]: 178.190.212.71:39903 WARNING
CVE-2017-7478: Proof of Concept Code for the OpenVPN Pre-Authentication DoS Vulnerability - dos_server.py
We have a test server running that has Elastix 2.4 with OpenVPN installed. I have confirmed that I can connect from a Windows PC running an OpenVPN client, but when I try to connect a T38, it fails.
When openvpn is running it should be running as the root user. This can be verified using ps or any other process lister/monitor. I personally use htop. Force a running openvpn connection to restart and see if it is successful: $ sudo killall -SIGUSR1 openvpn
Aug 09, 2016 · You have the correct packages. There are 2 basic ways to config openvpn. The article cited places a *.conf file in the openvpn directory. There would also be a reference to this in the etc\config\openvpn file. Wed Mar 28 15:39:06 2018 us=199327 UDP READ [292] from [AF_INET]192.200.20.23:22: P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 sid=bf994acc d2bfc6b4 [ 3 sid=31c6b425 e7174d47 ] pid=4 DATA 17030100 208465cb 3c52c147 13f62846 037ca378 f6bb93fa 67825f2f ecbaf72[more May 13, 2017 · SMF version 2.0.15 with SMF4Mobile versions 1.1.5 and 1.2 suffer from an open redirection vulnerability. When openvpn is running it should be running as the root user. This can be verified using ps or any other process lister/monitor. I personally use htop. Force a running openvpn connection to restart and see if it is successful: $ sudo killall -SIGUSR1 openvpn Apr 8 17:41:45 ***** nm-openvpn[9107]: NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts Apr 8 17:41:45 ***** nm-openvpn[9107]: RESOLVE: Cannot resolve host address: us-east.privateinternetaccess.com: Temporary failure in name resolution Apr 8 17:42:20 ***** nm-openvpn[9107]: message repeated UDPv4 WRITE [114] to [AF_INET]10.146.7.218:8443 (via [AF_INET]10.146.7.195%Port2): P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 [ ] pid=10 DATA len=100 Wed Apr 22 10:02:10 2020 us=955007 [31956] UDPv4 READ [22] from [AF_INET]10.146.7.218:8443 (via [AF_INET]10.146.7.195%Port2): P_ACK_V1 kid=0 [ 12 ] Wed Apr 22 10:02:38 2020 us=998361 [31956] UDPv4 WRITE [114] to [AF_INET